Is it true that ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib and ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) were killed by some Muslim people? Can you explain what the problem was that arose among the Sahaabah during that period and tell me of some books that deal with this topic?.
Praise be to Allaah.
It should be understood – may Allah protect us and you from
confusion and specious arguments, both obvious and subtle – that the
Companions of Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) were the
best companions of the best Prophet, especially the four Rightly Guided
Caliphs.
Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And the first to embrace Islam of the Muhajiroon (those
who migrated from Makkah to Al-Madinah) and the Ansar (the citizens of
Al-Madinah who helped and gave aid to the Muhajiroon) and also those who
followed them exactly (in Faith). Allah is well-pleased with them as they
are well-pleased with Him”
[at-Tawbah 9:100].
Ibn Katheer (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Here Allah
the Almighty tells us that He is pleased with the first to embrace Islam of
the Muhaajireen and Ansaar, and those who followed them in truth. So woe to
those who hate them or revile them, or who hate some of them and revile some
of them. End quote. Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 4/203
Allah, may He be exalted, says concerning the Muhaajireen
(interpretation of the meaning):
“(And there is also a share in this booty) for the poor
emigrants, who were expelled from their homes and their property, seeking
Bounties from Allah and to please Him. And helping Allah (i.e. helping His
religion) and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW). Such are indeed the truthful (to
what they say)”
[al-Hashr 59:8].
And Allah says concerning the Ansaar (interpretation of the
meaning):
“And those who, before them, had homes (in Al-Madinah) and
had adopted the Faith, love those who emigrate to them, and have no jealousy
in their breasts for that which they have been given (from the booty of
Banee An-Nadeer), and give them (emigrants) preference over themselves, even
though they were in need of that”
[al-Hashr 59:9].
And Allah says concerning the believers who come after them
(interpretation of the meaning):
“And those who came after them say: Our Lord! Forgive us
and our brethren who have preceded us in Faith, and put not in our hearts
any hatred against those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed full of
kindness, Most Merciful”
[al-Hashr 59:10].
With regard to what happened among the Sahaabah of
differences of opinion and fighting, we should refrain from discussing it,
whilst believing that they are the best of the ummah and loving them and
approving of them. This opinion has been repeatedly stated by Ahl as-Sunnah
wa’l-Jamaa‘ah.
‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azeez (may Allah have mercy on him) was
asked about ‘Ali and ‘Uthmaan, and the battles of the Camel and Siffeen, and
what happened among them. He said: That is blood that Allah caused me to
have no hand in shedding, and I do not want to dip my tongue in it (by
talking about it).
at-Tabaqaat al-Kubra, 5/394
A man asked Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal about what happened between
‘Ali and Mu‘aawiyah, and he turned away from him. It was said to him: O Abu
‘Abdullah, he is a man from Banu Haashim. He turned to him and said: Recite:
“That was a nation who has passed away. They shall receive the reward of
what they earned and you of what you earn. And you will not be asked of what
they used to do” [al-Baqarah 2:134].
Manaaqib al-Imam Ahmad by Ibn
al-Jawzi, p. 126
Imam Ahmad also said, after it was said to him: What do you
say about what happened between ‘Ali and Mu‘aawiyah? He said: I do not say
anything about them except what is best.
Manaaqib al-Imam Ahmad by Ibn
al-Jawzi, p. 164
Al-Maymooni said: Ahmad ibn Hanbal said to me: O Abu’l-Hasan,
if you see a man saying anything bad about any one of the Sahaabah, then be
suspicious about his Islam. Al-Fadl ibn Ziyaad said: I heard Abu ‘Abdullah
being asked about a man who criticized Mu‘aawiyah and ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas: can
he be called a Raafidi? He said: He did not the audacity to criticise them
except because he has some evil hidden in his heart. No one criticises any
one of the Sahaabah but he is concealing some evil in his heart. End quote.
Al-Bidaayah wa’n-Nihaayah,
8/139
Abu Zar‘ah ar-Raazi said:
If you see a man criticising any of the Companions of the
Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), then know
that he is a heretic, because in our view the Messenger (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him) is true and the Qur’aan is true. Rather this Qur’aan
and the Sunnah were conveyed to us by the Companions of the Messenger of
Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). They only want to
undermine the status of those who conveyed the Qur’aan (and the Sunnah) in
order to undermine the validity of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. But it is more
fitting that they be criticised, and they are heretics. End quote.
Al-Kifaayah fi ‘Ilm ar-Riwaayah,
p. 49
Al-Qurtubi said:
It is not permissible to attribute any deliberate mistake to
any of the Sahaabah, because they based all their actions on what they
believed was right and proper, and their intention was to Allah, may He be
glorified and exalted. They are all examples for us to follow and Allah has
instructed us to refrain from discussing the disagreements that arose among
them, and we should only mention them in the best way, because of the
sanctity of their being Companions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him), and because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be
upon him) forbade reviling them; moreover, Allah has forgiven them and told
us that He is pleased with them. End quote.
Tafseer al-Qurtubi, 16/321
Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawaani said, when discussing what the
Muslim is obliged to believe about the Companions of the Messenger of Allah
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and what should be said about
them [?]: No one of the Companions of the Messenger (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him) should be mentioned except in the best of terms, and we
should refrain from discussing the disputes that arose among them. They are
the most deserving of people to have their words and actions interpreted in
the best manner and to be thought of in the best terms. End quote.
‘Aqeedat Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah fi’s-Sahaabah
al-Kiraam, 2/734
Abu ‘Abdullah ibn Battah (may Allah have mercy on him) said,
discussing the beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah: After that we
should refrain from discussing the disputes that arose among the Companions
of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), for
they witnessed great events with him and were the first people to attain
virtue; Allah has forgiven them and has instructed us to pray for
forgiveness for them and to draw close to Him by means of loving them, as He
has enjoined on the lips of His Prophet. He knew what would happen among
them and that they would fight; however they were given precedence over the
rest of mankind because mistakes, whether deliberate or otherwise, were
already forgiven for them, and they have been forgiven for all disputes that
arose among them.
Kitaab ash-Sharh wa’l-Ibaanah ‘ala Usool as-Sunnah
wa’d-Diyaanah, p. 268
Abu ‘Uthmaan as-Saaboni said, discussing the belief of the
Salaf and scholars of hadeeth:
They believed that we should refrain from discussing the
disputes that arose among the Companions of the Messenger of Allah
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and that we should avoid saying
anything that may be construed as criticism of them; we should pray for
mercy for all of them and love all of them.
‘Aqeedat as-Salaf wa Ashaab al-Hadeeth,
in Majmoo‘at ar-Rasaa’il al-Muneeriyyah, 1/129
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
One of the basic principles of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah
is that they think of and speak of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in the best terms, as Allah, may
He be exalted, has described them (interpretation of the meaning):
“And those who came after them say: Our Lord! Forgive us
and our brethren who have preceded us in Faith, and put not in our hearts
any hatred against those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed full of
kindness, Most Merciful”
[al-Hashr 59:10].
And that is in obedience to the Prophet (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him), who said: “Do not revile my Companions, do not revile
my Companions, for by the One Whose hand is my soul, if one of you were to
spend the equivalent of Uhud in gold [in charity], it would not be
equivalent to the mudd [a unit of measure] of one of them or half of
that.”
They accept what is said in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and are
unanimously agreed on their virtues and status.
They do not believe that any of the Sahaabah are infallible
and were protected from major or minor sins; rather it is possible that they
may have committed sins in general, but they did a great deal of righteous
deeds and attained virtues by means of which they were forgiven for whatever
sins they committed, to such an extent that they were forgiven for bad deeds
for which no one who came after them was forgiven, because they did good
deeds that erased bad deeds, in a manner that was not granted to anyone who
came after them.
Moreover, if one of them did commit a sin, then he would have
repented from it, or done good deeds that erased it, or have been forgiven
for it by virtue of his being one of the first to come to Islam, or by means
of the intercession of Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)
of which they are the most deserving of people, or by being tested with a
calamity in this world by means of which it was expiated – if this is the
case with regard to real sins, then how about the matters in which they
based their actions on what they thought best (ijtihaad): if they got it
right they will have two rewards and if they got it wrong they will have one
reward and the mistake will be forgiven?
Moreover the amount of objectionable actions that some of
them may have done is very little and insignificant in comparison to their
virtues and good characteristics such as belief in Allah and His Messenger,
jihad for the sake of Allah, migration (Hijrah), supporting (the religion of
Allah), beneficial knowledge and righteous deeds.
Anyone who studies their biographies with knowledge and
insight, and sees what Allah bestowed upon them of virtues, will realise for
certain that they are the best of people after the Prophets; there never was
and there will never be anyone like them. They are the elite of this ummah,
which is the best of nations and the dearest of them to Allah, may He be
exalted. End quote.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 3/152-153
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said:
Ahl as-Sunnah are unanimously agreed that it is obligatory to
object to any slandering any of the Sahaabah because of what happened of
that (disputes), even if ones knows which of them was in the right, because
they did not fight in those wars except on the basis of what they thought
was right (ijtihaad), and Allah, may He be exalted, has forgiven the one who
is mistaken in his ijtihaad. Indeed it is proven that he will be given one
reward, and the one who gets it right will be given two rewards. End quote
Fath al-Baari, 13/34
A great deal of similar comments have been made by the
scholars and it is essential to follow that, because this will protect us
from making mistakes and it is acknowledging the rights of the best of
people after the Prophets.
As for the killing of ‘Uthmaan and ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased
with them both), there is no doubt that they were killed unlawfully and we
testify that they will be in Paradise, and we testify that the one who did
this action, or played any part in it, or approved of it, or knew of it and
did not denounce it, were led astray in the worst of ways and led others
astray, and was a man of evil, who followed a path other than that of the
believers; Allah will bring him to account on the Day of Resurrection for
his actions and Allah, may He be exalted, will judge between them on the Day
of Resurrection. “Say (O Muhammad SAW): O Allah!
Creator of the heavens and the earth! All-Knower of the Ghaib (unseen) and
the seen. You will judge between your slaves about that wherein they used to
differ” [az-Zumar 39:46].
