Refutation of those who claim that the story of the Isra’ and Mi‘raaj is a myth

Praise
be to Allah.

Firstly: 

Undoubtedly the Isra’ and Mi‘raaj are among the great signs
of Allah that point to the truth of His Messenger Muhammad (blessings and
peace of Allah be upon him) and to the greatness of his status before Allah,
may He be glorified and exalted. Furthermore they are among the proofs of
the great might and power of Allah, and of His highness above all of His
creation. Allah, may He be glorified, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Glorified (and Exalted) be He (Allah) (above all that (evil)
they associate with Him),Who took His slave (Muhammad (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him)) for a journey by night from Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at
Makkah) to the farthest mosque (in Jerusalem), the neighbourhood whereof We
have blessed, in order that We might show him (Muhammad (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him)) of Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, lessons, signs,
etc.). Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer”

[al-Isra’ 17:1]. 

It is narrated in mutawaatir reports from the Messenger of
Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he was taken up to the
heavens and that the gates of the heavens were opened for him, until he
passed beyond the seventh heaven, where his Lord, may He be glorified, spoke
to him as He willed and enjoined upon him the five daily prayers. Allah, may
He be glorified, initially enjoined them as fifty prayers, but our Prophet
Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) kept asking Him to
reduce it until He made it five, so they are five in terms of the obligation
but fifty in terms of reward, because each good deed brings a tenfold
reward. To Allah be praise and thanks for all His blessings. 

But people differed concerning the Isra’ and Mi‘raaj. Some of
them said that it was a dream, but the correct view is that he was taken on
the night journey (Isra’) and taken up into the heavens (Mi‘raaj) when he
was awake, because of an abundance of evidence that we will quote below. 

At-Tahhaawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said in his famous
book al-‘Aqeedah: The Mi‘raaj is true. The Prophet was taken on a
journey by night and was taken up to heaven himself when he was awake, then
he was taken as high up as Allah willed, and Allah honoured him with
whatever He willed, and revealed to him what He revealed.
“The (Prophet’s) heart lied not (in seeing) what he (Muhammad
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) saw” [an-Najm 53:11]
may the blessings and peace of Allah be upon him in the hereafter and in
this world. End quote. 

Ibn Abi’l-‘Izz al-Hanafi said in Sharh at-Tahhaawiyyah
(may Allah have mercy on him): 

The people differed concerning the Isra’. 

It was said that the Isra’ involved his soul only and his
body was never absent. This was narrated by Ibn Ishaaq from ‘Aa’ishah
and Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them), and a similar report was
narrated from al-Hasan al-Basri. But it should be noted that there is a
difference between saying that the Isra’ was a dream and saying that it
involved his soul but not his body. There is a great difference between the
two ideas. ‘Aa’ishah and Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them) did not
say that it was a dream; rather they said that his soul was taken by night
but his body was not absent. The difference between the two is that what a
sleeper sees in his dream may be representations of things that are known in
real life. So in a dream it may be as if a person sees himself being taken
up to heaven and being taken to Makkah, but his soul did not ascend or go
there; rather the angel of dreams caused him to see a representation of
something. They [‘Aa’ishah and Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them)]
did not mean that the Isra’ was a dream; what they meant was that the soul
itself was taken on the night journey, so it left the body and then returned
to it, and they regarded this as something unique to the Prophet (blessings
and peace of Allah be upon him), because no one else could have the
experience of their very soul ascending completely to heaven except after
death. 

It was also suggested that the Isra’ occurred twice: once
when he was awake and once in a dream … Similarly, some of them said that it
happened twice: once before the revelation began and once after that. Others
said that it happened three times: once before the revelation began and
twice after that. Every time there was some ambiguity they suggested that
this was a separate occurrence, so as to reconcile between the reports. 
This was done by those who were da‘eef (weak) in knowledge of hadith. In
contrast, the view of the leading scholars of hadith is that the Isra’
occurred once, in Makkah, after the Prophet’s mission began and one year
before his Hijrah (migration to Madinah); it was also suggested that it
occurred one year and two months before that, as stated by Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr.

 From the
hadith of the Isra’ it is known that he was taken on the night journey in a
physical sense when he was awake, according to the correct opinion,
from al-Masjid al-Haraam to al-Masjid al-Aqsa, riding on al-Buraaq, in the
company of Jibreel (peace be upon him). He halted there and led the Prophets
in prayer, and he tied al-Buraaq to the ring of the door of the mosque. It
was also said that he halted in Bethlehem and prayed there, but there is no
sound report to that effect at all. 

Then he was taken up from Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem) on that
night to the first heaven, where Jibreel asked for it to be opened and it
was opened for them. There he saw Adam, the father of mankind; he greeted
him with salaam and he welcomed him and returned his salaam, and
acknolwedged his Prophethood. Then he was taken up to the second heaven… 

… and he (may Allah have mercy on him) said: One of the
proofs that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was taken
on the night journey (Isra’) physically when he was awake is the verse in
which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Glorified (and Exalted) be He (Allah) (above all that (evil)
they associate with Him), Who took His slave (Muhammad (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him)) for a journey by night from Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at
Makkah) to the farthest mosque (in Jerusalem)”

[al-Isra’ 17:1].

The word “slave” implies both body and soul, just as the word
“person” implies both body and soul. This is the regular meaning when the
word is used in the usual sense, and this is the correct view. So the Isra’
involved both body and soul, and that is not contrary to reason. If we
accept that it is far-fetched to think that a person could ascend to heaven,
then we should accept that it is far-fetched to think that the angels could
descend, and that would lead to denying Prophethood, which constitutes kufr
(disbelief). 

End quote from Sharh at-Tahhaawiyyah (1/245) 

Ibn Katheer (may Allah have mercy on him) said in his
Tafseer (3/33):

Then the people differed as to whether the Isra’ involved
both body and soul, or only his soul. There are two views; the majority of
scholars are of the view that he was taken on the night journey both body
and soul, when he was awake, and not in a dream, although they do not reject
the idea that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him) may have seen a dream before that, then seen those things after that
when he was awake, because he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)
never saw a dream but it came true like the breaking of dawn. The evidence
for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says
(interpretation of the meaning):

“Glorified (and Exalted) be He (Allah) (above all that (evil)
they associate with Him),Who took His slave (Muhammad (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him)) for a journey by night from Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at
Makkah) to the farthest mosque (in Jerusalem), the neighbourhood whereof We
have blessed”

[al-Isra’ 17:1]. 

Tasbeeh [the phrase “Subhaan Allah (Glory be to Allah or
Glorified be Allah)] is used in the case of matters of great significance.
If it had been a dream, there would have been nothing great about it and it
would not have been regarded as being of such great significance; the
disbelievers of Quraysh would not have hastened to disbelieve him and a
number of those who had previously become Muslim would not have apostatised.
Moreover, the word “slave” refers to both soul and body together, and Allah,
may He be exalted, said “Who
took His slave (Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) for a
journey by night”, and
He, may He be exalted, also said (interpretation of the meaning):
“And We made not the vision
which we showed you but a trial for mankind, and likewise the accursed tree”
[al-Isra’ 17:60]. Ibn
‘Abbaas said: This was something that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and
peace of Allah be upon him) saw with his own eyes on the night in which he
was taken on the night journey (Isra’), and the accursed tree is the tree of
az-zaqqoom. Narrated by al-Bukhaari (2885). Allah, may He be exalted, says
(interpretation of the meaning):
“The sight (of Prophet Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah
be upon him)) turned not aside (right or left), nor it transgressed beyond
(the) limit (ordained for it)” [an-Najm 53:17];
sight is one of the physical faculties, not part of the soul. 

Moreover, he was carried on al-Buraaq, which was a shining
white animal; this can only refer to the body, not the soul, because to move
the soul there is no need for a mount to carry it. And Allah knows best. End
quote. 

Shaykh Haafiz al-Hakami said in Ma‘aarij al-Qubool
(3/1067): If the Isra’ and Mi‘raaj had to do with the soul in a dream,
Quraysh would not have rejected it and they would not have said, It takes us
a month by camel to reach Jerusalem and a month to come back, but Muhammad
claims that he was taken there last night and was back here with us this
morning…! And they ridiculed him (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
If that had been a dream, they would not have found it so far-fetched and
there would have been no meaning in their rejecting it, because a person may
see in his dream things that are farther away than Jerusalem, and no one
will disbelieve his dream or find it far-fetched. But the Messenger of Allah
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) told them about a night journey
that was real and had happened when he was awake, not in a dream, so they
rejected it and ridiculed him, as they found it far-fetched and outrageous,
and also out of stubbornness, because they had little knowledge of the might
and power of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, and they did not
realise that Allah does whatever He wills. Hence when they told Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq
about it, he said: If he said it, then it is true. They said: Do you really
believe him? He said: Yes, and I believe him in something even more
extraordinary than that, that news from heaven comes to him in the morning
or in the afternoon – or words that effect. End quote. 

Al-Haafiz Abu’l-Khattaab ‘Umar ibn Dihyah said in his book
at-Tanweer fi Mawlid as-Siraaj al-Muneer: There are mutawaatir reports
about the hadith of the Isra’ narrated from ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab, ‘Ali, Ibn
Mas‘ood, Abu Dharr, Maalik ibn Sa‘sa‘ah, Abu Hurayrah, Abu Sa‘eed, Ibn
‘Abbaas, Shaddaad ibn Aws, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b, ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Qart, Abu
Habbah al-Ansaari, Abu Layla al-Ansaari, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr, Jaabir,
Hudhayfah, Buraydah, Abu Ayyoob, Abu Umaamah, Samurah ibn Jundub,
Abu’l-Hamra’, Suhayb ar-Roomi, Umm Haani’, and ‘Aa’ishah and Asma’ the
daughters of Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq (may Allah be pleased with them all). Some
of them reported it at length and others reported it more briefly. Even
though the reports of some of them do not meet the conditions of soundness,
there is consensus among the Muslims on the hadith of the Isra’, but the
heretics turned away from it, seeking to put out the Light of Allah (i.e.
the religion of Islam, this Qur’an, and Prophet Muhammad  (blessings and
peace of Allah be upon him)) with their mouths. But Allah will complete His
Light even though the disbelievers hate (it) (cf. as-Saff 61:8).

End quote from Tafseer Ibn Katheer (3/63) 

Secondly: 

The way in which this writer discussed the issue and reached
his conclusions is astounding, because he referred to one of the many
demands that the disbelievers had made, and he gave the impression that the
Qur’anic response – “Say
(O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)): ‘Glorified (and
Exalted) be my Lord (Allah) above all that evil they (polytheists) associate
with Him! Am I anything but a man, sent as a Messenger?’”
[al-Isra’ 17:93] – is
referring to that particular demand, namely ascending up into the sky, and
indicating that it is not possible for the Prophet (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him) to do that. But in fact this Qur’anic response was
referring to a number of demands that the mushrikeen made out of
stubbornness and going to extremes in rejection and denial. There follow
these demands as described in the Qur’an (interpretation of the meaning):

“And they say: ‘We shall not believe in you (O Muhammad
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)), until you cause a spring to
gush forth from the earth for us;

‘Or you have a garden of date-palms and grapes, and cause
rivers to gush forth in their midst abundantly;

‘Or you cause the heaven to fall upon us in pieces, as you
have pretended, or you bring Allah and the angels before (us) face to face;

‘Or you have a house of adornable materials (like silver and
pure gold, etc.), or you ascend up into the sky, and even then we will put
no faith in your ascension until you bring down for us a Book that we would
read.’ Say (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)):
‘Glorified (and Exalted) be my Lord (Allah) above all that evil they
(polytheists) associate with Him! Am I anything but a man, sent as a
Messenger?”

[al-Isra’ 17:90-93]. 

Think about these demands that deserve no response except the
Qur’anic response: “Say
(O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)): ‘Glorified (and
Exalted) be my Lord (Allah) above all that evil they (polytheists) associate
with Him! Am I anything but a man, sent as a Messenger?’” 

Is it possible for one who is a human being to cause a spring
to gush forth from the earth, and rivers, or to cause the heaven to fall
down, or to bring Allah (!) and the angels, or to ascend up into the sky and
bring from it a Book addressed to every disbeliever?! As it says in the
commentary that was narrated from Mujaahid and others. And this is in
accordance with the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says
(interpretation of the meaning):

“Nay, everyone of them desires that he should be given pages
spread out (coming from Allah with a writing that Islam is the right
religion, and Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has come
with the truth from Allah the Lord of the heavens and earth, etc.)”

[al-Muddaththir 74:52]. 

Undoubtedly these are not characteristics of human beings,
nor are they within their capabilities. The statement of the Qur’an that the
Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is not able to do that
refers to all of these demands together, and not just some of them, because
among them are some demands that are ordinarily possible. It is proven that
water sprang from between the fingers of the Prophet (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him), as is narrated in Saheeh al-Bukhaari (3576) and
elsewhere, so how about causing springs to gush forth from the earth (i.e.,
that is not impossible for him either). It is also not impossible that he
could have had a garden of date palms… and other demands that they made. But
the disbelievers had no real interest in these things; rather their main aim
was to go to extremes in stubbornness and obstinacy with the Messenger for
the sake of persisting in their transgression. 

At-Taahir ibn ‘Ashoor (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Because their demands were based on stubbornness, Allah instructed him to
respond to them in a manner that would highlight astonishment at their words
by saying “‘Glorified
(and Exalted) be my Lord”,
as this phrase is used to express astonishment, then follow that with a
question by way of rebuke and emphasizing that he was no more than a human
with a message from his Lord, i.e., I am not a lord who is in control, such
that I could create what is demanded of me, so how could I bring Allah and
the angels, and how could I create on earth what was not created in it?

End quote. 

At-Tahreer wa’t-Tanweer
(15/210-211) 

Thirdly: 

Protect yourself against anything that may make you doubt,
and be more eager to take care of your religious commitment than to acquire
wealth, and do not give the devils among men and jinn any way to undermine
the certainty in your heart or to shake your faith. So long as you have not
acquired sufficient Islamic knowledge to protect yourself from the specious
arguments of the doubters, then flee from such people and avoid sitting with
them or meeting with them; do not listen to their fancy words, for you do
not know whether doubt will take root in your heart when you leave them, and
if you expose yourself to confusion, will you be able to save yourself from
it or will you fall prey to it? We ask Allah to guide us and all His slaves
who affirm His Oneness. 

And Allah knows best.