Please do explain to me the oblogation of reading fatiha in loud prayer.i used to read but before couple of weeks my teacher told me u dont have to read it in louder prayers and refered me to sheikh nasir ul din albani RA in which sheikh says it was obligatory but then it got abrogated which u would have read ..please clear this matter that “is it obligatory to read fatiha even if imam is reading it and it is not abrogated” with some proofs because i need to show them to my teacher”keeping the daleel of sheikh albani RA in mind”
Praise
be to Allah
Firstly:
We have previously mentioned the difference of scholarly
opinion concerning this matter, and some of the evidence that they quoted,
and we noted that the more correct view is that it is obligatory for the one
who is praying behind an imam to recite al-Faatihah in the prayers in which
recitation is done out loud. Please see fatwa no. 10995
and 26746.
Secondly:
With regard to Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on
him), his view is that recitation behind the imam was abrogated, and he
quoted as evidence for that the report narrated by Abu Dawood (826), at-Tirmidhi
(312), Ahmad (7270) and Ibn Hibbaan (1851) from Abu Hurayrah, according to
which the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)
completed a prayer in which he recited out loud, then he said: “Was one of
you reciting with me just now?” A man said: Yes, O Messenger of Allah. He
said: “I was saying to myself, what is wrong with me that someone is
fighting to wrest the Qur’an from me.” So the people stopped reciting with
the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in prayers
in which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited out
loud, when they heard that from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace
of Allah be upon him).
But the scholars explained that the words in this hadith –
“So the people stopped reciting…” – are not the words of Abu Hurayrah (may
Allah be pleased with him). Rather they are the words of Ibn Shihaab
az-Zuhri (may Allah have mercy on him), therefore they do not constitute
evidence.
Abu Dawood said, after narrating the hadith:
I heard Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Faaris say: The words “So the
people stopped reciting…” are the words of az-Zuhri.
This was also stated by at-Tirmidhi, who said:
One of the companions of az-Zuhri narrated this hadith and
mentioned these words, saying: “So the people stopped reciting … when they
heard that from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him).”
Al-Bayhaqi said in as-Sunan (2/226):
Al-Awzaa‘i mentioned that these were the words of az-Zuhri,
so he separated them from the hadith.
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
With regard to the words in this hadith – “So the people
stopped reciting…” to the end of the report – most of the narrators from
whom Ibn Shihaab narrated this hadith regarded them as being the words of
Ibn Shihaab. End quote from al-Istidhkaar (1/464)
Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The words “So the people stopped reciting…” to the end of the
report are a gloss on the text, and are the words of az-Zuhri. This was
stated by al-Khateeb, and al-Bukhaari agreed with him in at-Tareekh,
as did Abu Dawood, Ya‘qoob ibn Sufyaan, adh-Dhuhli, al-Khattaabi and others.
End quote from at-Talkhees al-Habeer (1/565).
Ibn al-Mulaqqin (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The words “So the people stopped reciting…” are the words of
az-Zuhri, and are not to be regarded as part of the hadith. This was stated
by al-Bukhaari, adh-Dhahabi, Ibn Faaris, Abu Dawood, Ibn Hibbaan, al-Khattaabi
and others.
End quote from Mirqaat al-Mafaateeh (2/701)
One of the things that indicate that these words are not
those of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) is the fact that Abu
Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) used to instruct people to recite
al-Faatihah behind the imam.
Al-Bayhaqi said in al-Ma‘rifah (3/77):
How can that be attributed to Abu Hurayrah, when Abu Hurayrah
used to instruct people to recite al-Faatihah behind the imam, both in
prayers in which recitation is done out loud and those in which it is done
quietly? End quote.
An-Nasaa’i narrated this hadith of Abu Hurayrah in
al-Kubra (2895) and classed it as da‘eef, saying:
Regarding the soundness of the narration of this hadith from
the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) there is some
discussion, because its narrator is Ibn Ukaymah al-Laythi, who is unknown
and did not narrate anything except this one hadith; no one narrated it from
him except az-Zuhri, and az-Zuhri did not know anything about him except the
fact that he saw him talking to Sa‘eed ibn al-Musayyab. Al-Humaydi said
concerning the hadith of Ibn Ukaymah: This is a hadith that was narrated by
an unknown man from whom nothing else was ever narrated.
An-Nasaa’i said: In the proven hadith, from al-‘Ala’ ibn ‘Abd
ar-Rahmaan, from Abu’s-Saa’ib, from Abu Hurayrah, it says that the Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever offers a prayer in
which he does not recite the Essence of the Qur’an [i.e., al-Faatihah], it
is defective.” I [Abu’s-Saa’ib] said: O Abu Hurayrah, sometimes I am
(praying) behind the imam. He poked me in the arm and said: O Persian!
Recite it to yourself. Abu Hurayrah was the narrator of both hadiths, which
indicates that the report of Ibn Ukaymah is da‘eef, or that what was meant
in the hadith of Ibn Ukaymah was to tell people not to recite out loud
behind the imam, or to tell them not to recite another soorah among what is
recited out loud. End quote.
Conclusion: the correct view is that these words are a gloss
and are the words of az-Zuhri, not the words of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be
pleased with him).
Assuming that they are indeed the words of Abu Hurayrah, what
is meant is to tell people not to recite out loud behind the imam, or not to
recite another soorah after al-Faatihah, and so on.
With regard to telling people not to recite al-Faatihah, and
saying that it is abrogated – as was the view of Shaykh al-Albaani (may
Allah have mercy on him) in Sifat as-Salaah (p. 97) – we have
discussed the flaws in the report on which he based this view.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
With regard to the hadith of Abu Hurayrah which is also
narrated in as-Sunan, in which it says, “So the people stopped
reciting with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him) in prayers in which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him) recited out loud”, what is meant by the reciting that the people
stopped doing is recitation of a soorah other than al-Faatihah, because they
could not have stopped reciting a soorah of which the Messenger of Allah
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Do not do anything but the
Essence of the Qur’an [al-Faatihah], for there is no prayer for the one who
does not recite it.
Hence the correct view is that the view of one who claims
that it is abrogated – i.e., that recitation behind the imam who is reciting
out loud is abrogated – is a view that is not correct, because one cannot
claim that abrogation has taken place when it is possible to reconcile
between the reports, and it is well-known that if it is possible to
reconcile between reports by means of suggesting that one report is general
and the other is specific, then we cannot move onto saying that abrogation
took place.
End quote from Majmoo‘ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il al-‘Uthaymeen
(13/131)
Quoting this hadith as evidence that recitation behind the
imam was abrogated is not valid, because these words are not proven to be
the words of Abu Hurayrah; rather they are the words of az-Zuhri.
Even if we assume that they were the words of Abu Hurayrah,
what is meant is that the people stopped reciting anything more than al-Faatihah.
Thus we may reconcile the reports that were narrated concerning this issue.
We should point out that this issue is one of the issues that
are subject to ijtihad. Whoever has the ability to examine the evidence and
determine what is more sound should act upon what he thinks is more correct
in his view. Whoever does not have the ability to do that should follow a
scholar who is trustworthy in his religious commitment and knowledge. It is
not permissible to take this matter of ijtihad as a means of casting
aspersions upon scholars, or to engage in arguments that lead to
factionalism, division and dissent among people.
And Allah knows best.
